<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the New &amp; Improved Firefox Logo Style Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/</link>
	<description>Pardon our dust: design work in progress.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:29:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ps2 games</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-18486</link>
		<dc:creator>ps2 games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-18486</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ps2 games...&lt;/strong&gt;

Playing video games can also give you many new friendss...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ps2 games&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Playing video games can also give you many new friendss&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tenser</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-10834</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tenser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-10834</guid>
		<description>I was going to ask &quot;Please forgive my ignorance, but where is the guide?&quot; but then I re-read it and spotted the link. :)

Just a small advice, feel free to ignore: Could you add a subtle underline of links on your blog, or maybe change the color slightly? I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s just my poor screen, but I can barely see links on your blog without hovering over them with the mouse. A nice trick if you don&#039;t like the traditional underline look of links: a:link {border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc}. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to ask &#8220;Please forgive my ignorance, but where is the guide?&#8221; but then I re-read it and spotted the link. <img src='http://www.intothefuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just a small advice, feel free to ignore: Could you add a subtle underline of links on your blog, or maybe change the color slightly? I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s just my poor screen, but I can barely see links on your blog without hovering over them with the mouse. A nice trick if you don&#8217;t like the traditional underline look of links: a:link {border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc}. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-10833</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-10833</guid>
		<description>Thanks, all, for the comments. Some specific thoughts:

@Dolske - will check into this, thanks.

@Fligtar - great idea. We&#039;ll definitely add this to the next iteration of the guide.

@Alex - good thoughts. Building our design community is one of my top goals for the next six months, and I sincerely hope that this guide facilitates that as opposed to being any sort of discouraging force. Future versions of the guide will likely have more positive examples of community art as references, and Tara and I are working on a larger program to get more designers involved in Mozilla. Stay tuned for more about that soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, all, for the comments. Some specific thoughts:</p>
<p>@Dolske &#8211; will check into this, thanks.</p>
<p>@Fligtar &#8211; great idea. We&#8217;ll definitely add this to the next iteration of the guide.</p>
<p>@Alex &#8211; good thoughts. Building our design community is one of my top goals for the next six months, and I sincerely hope that this guide facilitates that as opposed to being any sort of discouraging force. Future versions of the guide will likely have more positive examples of community art as references, and Tara and I are working on a larger program to get more designers involved in Mozilla. Stay tuned for more about that soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Faaborg</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-10829</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Faaborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-10829</guid>
		<description>I understand that we have to protect our trademark, but I also find it a little disconcerting to see community generated artwork with a large X over it.  Of course I&#039;m looking at this from the perspective of trying to figure out how we can attract more designers into our community, as opposed to how we can maintain control over our ability to go after malicious copies of Firefox (which means we have to actively show we are protecting our logo).

Is there some middle ground?  Some way we could instruct people that they are encouraged to create derivative work but they have to [idea here]?  Some way we could enable and encourage this type of design work without losing control of our own logo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that we have to protect our trademark, but I also find it a little disconcerting to see community generated artwork with a large X over it.  Of course I&#8217;m looking at this from the perspective of trying to figure out how we can attract more designers into our community, as opposed to how we can maintain control over our ability to go after malicious copies of Firefox (which means we have to actively show we are protecting our logo).</p>
<p>Is there some middle ground?  Some way we could instruct people that they are encouraged to create derivative work but they have to [idea here]?  Some way we could enable and encourage this type of design work without losing control of our own logo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Glazman</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-10828</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Glazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-10828</guid>
		<description>Peter Parker&#039;s uncle was a wise philosopher ?-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Parker&#8217;s uncle was a wise philosopher ?-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-10827</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-10827</guid>
		<description>Looks great John.

One thing I&#039;d like to see, perhaps on the &quot;responsible use&quot; page, is a note on updating the old 1.0 logo with the new logo, and how to tell the difference. It seems like more news articles and sites use the old logo than the new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great John.</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;d like to see, perhaps on the &#8220;responsible use&#8221; page, is a note on updating the old 1.0 logo with the new logo, and how to tell the difference. It seems like more news articles and sites use the old logo than the new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Dolske</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-10826</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-10826</guid>
		<description>Something&#039;s funky with the high-res images...

EG: on http://www.mozilla.com/img/tignish/about/logo/download/logo-only.png

The dropshadow seems to be pixelated along a 5x5 grid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something&#8217;s funky with the high-res images&#8230;</p>
<p>EG: on <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/img/tignish/about/logo/download/logo-only.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.com/img/tignish/about/logo/download/logo-only.png</a></p>
<p>The dropshadow seems to be pixelated along a 5&#215;5 grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2008/09/26/introducing-the-new-improved-firefox-logo-style-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-10825</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=134#comment-10825</guid>
		<description>It looks awesome! Pleasure working with you on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks awesome! Pleasure working with you on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
