Comments on: Firefox 3.5 Logo Unveiled http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/03/25/firefox-35-logo-unveiled/ Pardon our dust: design work in progress. Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:49:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Tom http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/03/25/firefox-35-logo-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-14141 Tom Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:07:22 +0000 http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=457#comment-14141 That isn't a change worth mentioning in any way. Of course the version number would have to be changed, and most likely it should be changed to reflect the current version it is for. I do not even have the words to describe the FAIL of any mention of this logo change. That isn’t a change worth mentioning in any way. Of course the version number would have to be changed, and most likely it should be changed to reflect the current version it is for. I do not even have the words to describe the FAIL of any mention of this logo change.

]]> By: Ken Saunders http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/03/25/firefox-35-logo-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-13831 Ken Saunders Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:53:40 +0000 http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=457#comment-13831 I see an exciting change. I don't know a darn thing about version numbering, but 3.5 certainly looks better, more progressive. I see an exciting change.

I don’t know a darn thing about version numbering, but 3.5 certainly looks better, more progressive.

]]> By: John http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/03/25/firefox-35-logo-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-13825 John Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:57:49 +0000 http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=457#comment-13825 @Goobi...only difference is that we changed the .1 to a .5 (the font is the same as always). Not a huge change, for sure! @Goobi…only difference is that we changed the .1 to a .5 (the font is the same as always). Not a huge change, for sure!

]]> By: Goobi http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/03/25/firefox-35-logo-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-13824 Goobi Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:54:17 +0000 http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=457#comment-13824 I don't see anything different! Apart from maybe the font that is. Is there? I don’t see anything different! Apart from maybe the font that is. Is there?

]]>