<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onward and Upward for Mozilla.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/08/17/onward-and-upward-for-mozilla-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/08/17/onward-and-upward-for-mozilla-com/</link>
	<description>Pardon our dust: design work in progress.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:29:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Webdev &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Download Stats move to mozilla.com</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/08/17/onward-and-upward-for-mozilla-com/comment-page-1/#comment-17520</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Webdev &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Download Stats move to mozilla.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=803#comment-17520</guid>
		<description>[...] a part of our renewed efforts to innovate more rapidly on mozilla.com, our first sprint brings download information to mozilla.com. From release to release we hope this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a part of our renewed efforts to innovate more rapidly on mozilla.com, our first sprint brings download information to mozilla.com. From release to release we hope this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skierpage</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/08/17/onward-and-upward-for-mozilla-com/comment-page-1/#comment-17518</link>
		<dc:creator>skierpage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=803#comment-17518</guid>
		<description>Definitely reassure users.  If they&#039;re running something else, tell them &quot;You can keep your existing browser, Firefox will read in its bookmarks when it starts&quot;; if they&#039;re running earlier Firefox tell them Firefox will seamlessly keep their bookmarks, history, etc.

Regarding the Upgrade page:
The three clocks are confusing.  Light blue reads as a good color, so it seems I&#039;m getting less goodness.

&quot;3,669 ms&quot; is hopelessly geeky.  &quot;3.67 seconds&quot; is obviously better.

And the stopwatch advance doesn&#039;t match the times, it&#039;s showing 45 seconds, 8 seconds, and 3 seconds.  You put weird markings on the stopwatch as a hint these aren&#039;t seconds, but it&#039;s &quot;truth-y&quot; graphics at best.  If you had regular 12 division clock face and showed actual second hand positions with recognizable &quot;1.52 seconds!&quot; underneath them it would be more readable and more impressive.

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely reassure users.  If they&#8217;re running something else, tell them &#8220;You can keep your existing browser, Firefox will read in its bookmarks when it starts&#8221;; if they&#8217;re running earlier Firefox tell them Firefox will seamlessly keep their bookmarks, history, etc.</p>
<p>Regarding the Upgrade page:<br />
The three clocks are confusing.  Light blue reads as a good color, so it seems I&#8217;m getting less goodness.</p>
<p>&#8220;3,669 ms&#8221; is hopelessly geeky.  &#8220;3.67 seconds&#8221; is obviously better.</p>
<p>And the stopwatch advance doesn&#8217;t match the times, it&#8217;s showing 45 seconds, 8 seconds, and 3 seconds.  You put weird markings on the stopwatch as a hint these aren&#8217;t seconds, but it&#8217;s &#8220;truth-y&#8221; graphics at best.  If you had regular 12 division clock face and showed actual second hand positions with recognizable &#8220;1.52 seconds!&#8221; underneath them it would be more readable and more impressive.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.intothefuzz.com/2009/08/17/onward-and-upward-for-mozilla-com/comment-page-1/#comment-17490</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intothefuzz.com/?p=803#comment-17490</guid>
		<description>I have aired my thoughts 2-3 months ago with the whole thing.

*gets on soap box*

I think that the uses and purposes of the different sites should be separate with clear uses... OOOR.. Merge all content to one page... so that getfirefox and mozilla.com and mozilla.org are all the same page or point to the same URL.

Mozilla.com should be about the organization. not about downloading its products. If it has a download on mozilla.com.. then get rid of it on getfirefox and .org..

I also think that all of the products should be easy to find.. or clear as to if its a mozilla product or not. What about Bugzilla? What about branches like seamonkey, songbird, sunbird, chatzilla.. I never know if I&#039;m supposed to find them at a .com or .org or hidden in the developer pages.

I think content is good. but it should be easy to know where the content is first.

By making the pages more user friendly.. you have gotten rid of content and thrown it on a different URL completely... Or you could make a new page called www.whatmozillapagewillhavewhatimlookingfor.org

*gets off of soap box*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have aired my thoughts 2-3 months ago with the whole thing.</p>
<p>*gets on soap box*</p>
<p>I think that the uses and purposes of the different sites should be separate with clear uses&#8230; OOOR.. Merge all content to one page&#8230; so that getfirefox and mozilla.com and mozilla.org are all the same page or point to the same URL.</p>
<p>Mozilla.com should be about the organization. not about downloading its products. If it has a download on mozilla.com.. then get rid of it on getfirefox and .org..</p>
<p>I also think that all of the products should be easy to find.. or clear as to if its a mozilla product or not. What about Bugzilla? What about branches like seamonkey, songbird, sunbird, chatzilla.. I never know if I&#8217;m supposed to find them at a .com or .org or hidden in the developer pages.</p>
<p>I think content is good. but it should be easy to know where the content is first.</p>
<p>By making the pages more user friendly.. you have gotten rid of content and thrown it on a different URL completely&#8230; Or you could make a new page called <a href="http://www.whatmozillapagewillhavewhatimlookingfor.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatmozillapagewillhavewhatimlookingfor.org</a></p>
<p>*gets off of soap box*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
